Certainty of Objects Cases

Subscribe on YouTube (NEW CHANNEL)

I help people navigate the complexities of crypto!

🎓 Simple and digestible information on cryptocurrencies, web3, and beyond.

🎬 One new video every week (I accept requests and reply to everything!)

📚 FREE courses, content, and other exciting giveaways.

Gareth Evans' personal youtube channel

Clayton v Ramsden [1943] A.C. 320

Facts: Property was left to the settlor's daughter. The trust would be invalid if she married a man not of the Jewish faith or parentage. She subsequently married a non-Jewish man.

Held: Lord Atkin said the condition subsequent here was void for uncertainty and therefore the daughter could benefit from the trust

  • Lord Russell said a beneficiary under a trust subject to a condition of defeasance must know from the outset what will or wont make them lose their interest

Re Baden’s Deed Trusts (No 2) [1973] Ch 9

Facts: The Court of Appeal considered whether the terms ‘relative’ and ‘dependant’ were conceptually uncertain

Held: It was held that they were both capable of being defined with sufficient certainty, so the trust was valid

  • ‘Relative’ could be rendered certain if interpreted to mean ‘descendants of a common ancestor’: although that sounds confusing too as we all descend from a common ancestor
  • Once conceptually certain, it then becomes a question of evidence as to whether any postulant can be proved to fall within it (Sachs LJ)
  • The court also said where there is a wide class of beneficiaries (e.g. ex-employees of large company) trustees cannot just wait for postulants to come forward → trustees must make a survey of the class to get a feel for who is potentially in class when exercising their discretion
  • Stamp LJ said that this is NOT the same as a requirement to make a list

Re Tuck's Settlement Trusts [1978] Ch 49

Facts: Beneficiary in this case was entitled to income of a fund while married to an ‘approved wife’ (i.e. a Jewish wife). The trust deed provided that any uncertainty could be resolved by referring questiongs to the Chief Rabbi

Held: The trust was valid as the meaning of Jewish faith could be resolved by reference to Jewish law

  • Note that the provision that uncertainty could be resolved by reference to an external third party was included in the trust instrument; This case is not authority for a general or implied power to refer questions to any third party to resolve uncertainty of condition

The Art of Getting a First in Law - ONLY £4.99

FOOL-PROOF methods of obtaining top grades

SECRETS your professors won't tell you and your peers don't know

INSIDER TIPS and tricks so you can spend less time studying and land the perfect job

We work really hard to provide you with incredible law notes for free...

The proceeds of this eBook helps us to run the site and keep the service FREE!

CONTENT