Privity of Contract

Subscribe on YouTube

I help people navigate their law degrees

🎓 Simple and digestible information on studying law effectively.

🎬 One new video every week (I accept requests and reply to everything!)

đź“š FREE courses, content, and other exciting giveaways.

Gareth Evans' personal youtube channel

Introduction

A third party is not under the obligations of a contract

Privity of contract means that only parties privy (i.e. in the contract) are subject to those rights and obligations in the contract

There are three parts to privity of contract:

  • A 3rd party cannot get a benefit from a contract they are not in
  • A 3rd party cannot be sued for a contract they are not in
  • A 3rd party cannot enforce any contract they are not in

Justification of the doctrine of privity of contract

Why do third parties have no rights/obligations for a contract they are not in?

  • They have made no agreement
  • They have provided no consideration

Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre v Selfridge [1915]: It is “fundamental’ for a party to have agreed and provided consideration if they are a party to a contract

In Tweddle v Atkinson [1861], it was said that even if the 3rd party has an interest in the contract, he/she will NOT be able to enforce it

In Beswick v Beswick [1968], it was said that even if a contract gives rights and obligations to a third party they will not be enforced

Exceptions to the doctrine of Privity

Privity of contract can be unfair especially where there is a benefit in the contract for a 3rd party; so there are some exceptions to the doctrine of privity of contract

Exceptions at common law:

  1. Agency
    • Agency = Agent (x) contracts with 3rd party (y) and acts on behalf of another party (z)
    • There is then an enforceable contract between the 3rd party and the principal

    • Diagram of how agency works in contract law

    • Lockett v Charles [1938]: Agents can bind the principal legally e.g. estate agents are the agents and not the landlords

  2. Assignment
    • You can assign your rights/obligations to a third party, particularly if the original contract says so
    • In certain cases someone else can fill your role in the contract e.g. continue the tenancy

Third party and damages

Only a party in a contract can get damages

However, in Jackson v Horizon Holidays [1975] Denning said a third party was able to claim damages. This case was doubted in Woodar Investment Development v Wimpey Construction [1980]

The Art of Getting a First in Law - ONLY ÂŁ4.99

FOOL-PROOF methods of obtaining top grades

SECRETS your professors won't tell you and your peers don't know

INSIDER TIPS and tricks so you can spend less time studying and land the perfect job

We work really hard to provide you with incredible law notes for free...

The proceeds of this eBook helps us to run the site and keep the service FREE!

CONTENT

Contracts (Rights of 3rd parties) Act 1999

An additional exception to privity of contract is seen in statute: the Contracts (Rights of 3rd parties) Act 1999

This Act is essentially created to to help 3rd parties to a contract where there was a benefit for them in that contract

There are two situations where 3rd parties could enforce a contract:

  • s1(1)(a) = If the contract says the 3rd party can enforce it
  • s1(1)(b) = If the contract appears to be for the benefit of the third party

See the case of Dolphin Maritime & Aviation Services Ltd v Sveriges Angfartygs Assurans Forening [2009] and Nishin Shipping Co. Ltd v Cleaves & Co. Ltd [2004]

But, the third party must be identified in the contract if they are to enforce it: “The third party must be expressly identified in the contract by name” s1(3)

  • In Avraamides v Colwill [2006], the court said that the 3rd party must be expressly state because the court will not imply the existence of a third party

Remedies for 3rd parties

If the contract gives rights to a 3rd party then “any remedy that would have been available to him in an action for breach of contract if he had been a party to the contract” will be available (s1(5))

  • In other words, the remedies available to third parties are same to the parties in the contract

Third parties do not need to provide consideration (they are unlikely to if they are not a party to the contract)

  • Dunlop v Selfridge [1915] even said a third party is a party that has not provided consideration

Law Application Masterclass - ONLY ÂŁ9.99

Learn how to effortlessly land vacation schemes, training contracts, and pupillages by making your law applications awesome. This eBook is constructed by lawyers and recruiters from the world's leading law firms and barristers' chambers.

âś… 60+ page eBook

âś… Research Methods, Success Secrets, Tips, Tricks, and more!

âś… Help keep Digestible Notes FREE

Course on the art of learning effectively, a reading masterclass