Insanity cases

Subscribe on YouTube

I help people navigate their law degrees

🎓 Simple and digestible information on studying law effectively.

🎬 One new video every week (I accept requests and reply to everything!)

📚 FREE courses, content, and other exciting giveaways.

Gareth Evans' personal youtube channel

R v Sullivan [1984] 1 AC 156

Facts: The appellant kicked a man. At the time of the attack he was suffering from epilepsy. The trial judge ruled that on the evidence the appropriate defence was insanity not automatism. The appellant appealed.

Held: The appeal was dismissed. The trial judge was correct in only allowing insanity to be put for the jury's consideration.

The Art of Getting a First in Law - ONLY £4.99

FOOL-PROOF methods of obtaining top grades

SECRETS your professors won't tell you and your peers don't know

INSIDER TIPS and tricks so you can spend less time studying and land the perfect job

We work really hard to provide you with incredible law notes for free...

The proceeds of this eBook helps us to run the site and keep the service FREE!

CONTENT