Checks and Constraints on the Supreme Court in US Politics

Constraints

Legal constraints and court traditions

⇒ Judges can only decide on what matters that are brought to it and courts usually only decide matters that are considered important and which affect a number of people (they have no power of initiation)

⇒ Courts tend to stay out of foreign policy - it took over 2 years after 9/11 for it to hear a case of holding terror suspects without trial. It has not yet dealt with the constitutionality of the War Powers Act 1973

Lack of enforcement power

⇒ It took presidential action to enforce Brown v Broad

⇒ While Roberts court has questioned the holding of terrorist suspects without trial, many terrorist suspects are still being held without trial

Public Opinion

⇒ The court will weigh up amicus curiae statements that outline the views of interested parties in court cases

⇒ The court has stepped back from reversing popular decisions (death penalty) and is wary of intervening in divisive issues (affirmative action)

⇒ It has become involved in gay rights only recently, after it sensed a shift in opinion, ruled on this issue in United States v Windsor 2013: the Defence of Marriage act 1996 was ruled unconstitutional because it defined marriage as between a man and a woman

Checks by other branches of government

Checks by Congress

⇒ SCOTUS decisions can be overturned by constitutional amendments. The 16th amendment allowed the introduction of a federal income tax, after the court struck down earlier laws allowing it to do so

⇒ The Senate confirms appointments - they get the final say on who sits on the court (e.g. they rejected Merrick Garland)

⇒ Congress have the power of impeachment (Abe Fortes resigned rather than face impeachment)

Checks by the president

⇒ Power to nominate judges (this can change the nature of the courte e.g. Gorsuch makes the court conservative)

⇒ President can throw his political weight behind a decision e.g.Bush snr publicly described the courts decision in Texas vs Johnson 1989 as "wrong, dead wrong"

Self-Restraint

⇒ Judges do not automatically follow the political preference of those who elected them

⇒ Justice Roberts: "Judges are servants of the law" (shown when he sided with liberals over the Obamacare case)

⇒ David Souter - appointed by Bush snr but became one of the most liberal members of the SCOTUS

⇒ Eisenhower said about appointing Chief Justice Earl Warren- "It was the biggest damn fool mistake I ever made"

dec